<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Rails Forum - Ruby on Rails Help and Discussion Forum - Dynamic forms gem development]]></title>
		<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=48392</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in Dynamic forms gem development.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic forms gem development]]></title>
			<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151326#p151326</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s what I&#039;d say to the team.</p><p>If you want to get some attention for your endeavor,&nbsp; you&#039;ll want to be able to say &#039;Used by Google, or Amazon,&nbsp; or whomever.</p><p>To get to that level,&nbsp; you will have to scale!&nbsp; </p><p>Put scalability first!</p><p>Do some benchmarking using both approaches.</p><p>Young developers often over engineer just because it&#039;s more interesting,&nbsp; loosing site of what really matters some times.&nbsp; &nbsp;You can always invest that eagerness to engineer cool software in the tools used by the developer that is developing with the Gem.&nbsp; But in the big picture,&nbsp; if you are successful,&nbsp; 99.9% of the usage of your Gem will be in a production environment,&nbsp; where scalability is very important.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BradHodges)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151326#p151326</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic forms gem development]]></title>
			<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151323#p151323</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Im pretty fixed on the first approach, but some of the people in my team (we are stablishing a sofware developer foundation in our small city, to incentivize young developers) argue that the second approach keeps things simplier for the developer that uses the gem.</p><p>Thanks for your answer, at least i can tell that we are moving in the right direction</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zonic)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151323#p151323</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: Dynamic forms gem development]]></title>
			<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151322#p151322</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>What&#039;s more important,&nbsp; speed or database size?</p><p>For speed, I&#039;d do the first approach,&nbsp; having a blank unused integer, date time, boolean, etc. is the trade off over not having to parse out of the blob for every data value.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (BradHodges)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151322#p151322</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Dynamic forms gem development]]></title>
			<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151320#p151320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>HI! </p><p>Im building a gem to add Dynamic Forms functionality to any Rails App. I have most of the specification working.</p><p>Im having some philosophical issues about the structure in where to store the answers to each form. The idea is that a &quot;question&quot; could have a reply in one specific type (string, text, boolea, etc) including lists of values (of the same type). </p><p>Im wondering how should i create the model for the replies. Should i make a column for each type of reply or should i use one blob column, using the question descriptor to transform the value back to it specific type?</p><p>Sorry for my bad english, its not my native language.</p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (zonic)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=151320#p151320</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
