<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Rails Forum - Ruby on Rails Help and Discussion Forum - this forum needs sub categories or tags]]></title>
		<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=1387</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The most recent posts in this forum needs sub categories or tags.]]></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:11:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>PunBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Re: this forum needs sub categories or tags]]></title>
			<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6678#p6678</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<div class="quotebox"><cite>dbit_solutions wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>It&#039;s already starting to get hard to find relevant stuff.&nbsp; I&#039;m sceptical about how useful the search function is going to be.&nbsp; Is there a way to conceptually organize questions?&nbsp; Tags, subcategories, user-driven taxonomy.</p></blockquote></div><p>We had some subcategories in some sections, but people weren&#039;t really using them and ended up just using the parent category.&nbsp; I&#039;m not sure I really like the idea of a million little highly specific forums. I find that that actually makes navigation harder and makes the entire forum more overwhelming rather than less.</p><p>We have talked about implementing a tag system on top of the normal forum categories.&nbsp; But this won&#039;t happen until after we switch to the Rails-based forum that is in development (rorBB).&nbsp; We&#039;re not going to invest too much into significantly modding PunBB since we&#039;ll be switching in the near(ish) future. <img src="http://railsforum.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" />&nbsp; And we definitely don&#039;t want to end up with something like <a href="http://blogoforum.com/">http://blogoforum.com/</a> ... which I find very difficult to navigate and I can only imagine how hard it must be to moderate.&nbsp; So we&#039;ll have to be careful how we add tagging, if we do.</p><div class="quotebox"><cite>dbit_solutions wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Also there is a huge diversity of levels.&nbsp; Some of the questions are advanced.&nbsp; Some are intermediate, some are newbie.&nbsp; I think questions should be classified according to those three categories.&nbsp; User votiing in this case could come in handy.</p></blockquote></div><p>Well, the forum really isn&#039;t just about questions... it&#039;s not really supposed to be set up like Rick Olson&#039;s Rails Weenie forum.&nbsp; With a tagging system, you could always tag questions with an experience level (I envision a tag system that acts as a sort of mini del.icio.us so you can save and tag threads for yourself).&nbsp; Again, though, this would be something that will have to wait until after we switch over to rorBB. <img src="http://railsforum.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p><div class="quotebox"><cite>dbit_solutions wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Also there is a diversity of the quality of questions.&nbsp; Some questions are super well-posed and super well-answered.&nbsp; It would be nice to be able to rate the utility of the question &amp; answers.&nbsp; (Again user voting.)&nbsp; Then filter the question and responses with the highest ratings.&nbsp; You might even be able to archive high scoring results as a kernel for a Tutorial section....</p></blockquote></div><p>I&#039;m not really too keen on voting on answers.&nbsp; Rails Weenie has this, and it works for them, but it&#039;s not really my thing.&nbsp; &nbsp;If everyone wants it, though, we&#039;d certainly have to consider it (and I&#039;m only one of the admins, afterall <img src="http://railsforum.com/img/smilies/wink.png" width="15" height="15" alt="wink" />)</p><p>Thanks for the suggestions, David. <img src="http://railsforum.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (Josh)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 21:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6678#p6678</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[this forum needs sub categories or tags]]></title>
			<link>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6671#p6671</link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s already starting to get hard to find relevant stuff.&nbsp; I&#039;m sceptical about how useful the search function is going to be.&nbsp; Is there a way to conceptually organize questions?&nbsp; Tags, subcategories, user-driven taxonomy.</p><p>Also there is a huge diversity of levels.&nbsp; Some of the questions are advanced.&nbsp; Some are intermediate, some are newbie.&nbsp; I think questions should be classified according to those three categories.&nbsp; User votiing in this case could come in handy.</p><p>Also there is a diversity of the quality of questions.&nbsp; Some questions are super well-posed and super well-answered.&nbsp; It would be nice to be able to rate the utility of the question &amp; answers.&nbsp; (Again user voting.)&nbsp; Then filter the question and responses with the highest ratings.&nbsp; You might even be able to archive high scoring results as a kernel for a Tutorial section....</p><p>Just some suggestions.... hope they help.... and hope even more that they are implemented.....</p><p>David <img src="http://railsforum.com/img/smilies/smile.png" width="15" height="15" alt="smile" /></p>]]></description>
			<author><![CDATA[dummy@example.com (dbit_solutions)]]></author>
			<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2006 20:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid>http://railsforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=6671#p6671</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
